As trade union members received a pay rise in Marikana,
Lomnin closed down one of their shafts, terminating an agreement which affected
12000 casual workers. Casual workers form an increasingly large component
of South Africa’s labour force. They receive fewer benefits, are paid
significantly less, and have less job security. They are not represented by
trade unions. Yet, the actions of the unions directly affect them. Are the
casual labourers being screwed by the unions?
Andrew Kerr published a recent working
paper on pay differentials in South Africa. Andy, please forgive me for
only discussing some basic descriptive statistics (which I concede are subject
to some caveats). According the KIDS data on workers in Natal, it seems that
trade unions in South Africa really do represent the economic elite. Only 10%
of the total labour force is unionised; and they earn significantly more than
the rest of the economy. Furthermore, according to this data, a shocking 40% of
workers are categorised as casual.
The Quarterly
Labour Force (averaged over the past 5 quarters) show similar trends. Only
30% of those working are unionised; and only 64% of workers claim to have a
permanent contract with their employer. Union members earn significantly more
So, how could the actions of trade unions hurt casual
worker? Simply put, a trade union represents only its members, and not all of
the work force. It will push for higher wages and larger job security and
benefits for their members. This is, of course, very important. However, with
higher job security and benefits, firms become reluctant to hire and opt for
hiring and rehiring casual labour on a short term basis. So, the unintended
consequence is a dual labour market, where a large part of the work force is
stuck with no job security or benefits. Those who suffer most are the new
entrants into the job market – the youth.
A recent report by the
Centre for Development of Enterprise (CDE), summarises study by Neil Rankin
from WITS on the difficulties of South African youth in finding permanent
employment.
No comments:
Post a Comment