Reading Jarrod Diamond’s Collapse
makes me think that economists need a better understanding of ecological
systems when we think about the appropriate role for government in combating
environmental problems. Welfare economics has demonstrated the need for
government intervention when information is imperfect or markets are
incomplete. A lot of market failures can therefore be overcome by developing
property rights and providing appropriate information.
However, Jarrod Diamond’s Collapse makes me think that there are some unique features of
environmental problems that our textbooks don’t address:
1.
Long lags
and Multiple Equilibriums: Environmental degradation, and its resulting
economic consequences, is not immediately visible. There are thus long lags in
price changes and resultant market responses. However, by the time the market
adjusts, it might be too late. This is because multiple equilibriums in
ecological systems means that environmental destruction is often a one-way
street: it cannot be reversed. Diamond’s example is of deforestation which
leads to erosion of all land, but overfishing is good current day example,
where fish stocks cannot be replenished to its original level.
2.
Systemic
Risk and Long-Term Environmental Cycles: Human beings have short time
horizons and we are not good at thinking about the risks of unlikely or
catastrophic events. As our societies become increasingly inter-dependent, we
benefit from the specialisation and exchange. However, inter-dependence also
creates risk. Furthermore, fortuitous circumstances today could be nothing more
than a centuries-long upward cycle. By increasing our systemic risk, we become
more vulnerable to collapse when environmental circumstances change. Diamond
cites the collapse of the Anasazi empire the US South-west where a complex
inter-dependent society developed over a couple of centuries of good rainfalls,
but imploded when rain become less frequent.
These examples invoke less
optimism in the market to adequately respond to risks of environmental
destruction.
No comments:
Post a Comment